| 转到 加州大学论坛 新版 | 返回论坛旧版 | 日 历 Calendar | 我的文章 My Posts | 资料修改 Modify ID | 留言簿 Message | 登录 Sign In | 退出 Sign Out | ||
|
发表文章
发起投票 |
树 形 | 返回文章列表
|
|
>
免费答疑--陈丹虹律师事务所移民 Free Immigration Q&A from Law Offices of Jean D.Chen
NIW Theory: #5 (Recommendation Letters) - By Justin Fok, Esq. |
|
|
NIW Theory: #5 (Recommendation Letters) - By Justin Fok, Esq. 摘自 加州大学论坛旧版 (Universities in California Bulletin Board System) 陈丹虹律师 2007-09-10 11:58 Quality recommendation letters are a critical element of a successful NIW application. While there is no required number of letters for an NIW, in our experience, 6-8 letters is a good rule of thumb for most applications. Much more important than the quantity of the letters is the quality of the letters themselves. It is better to have four high quality letters from established authorities in the field who do not have a relationship with you, than to have twenty mediocre letters from your colleagues at work. Below are some guidelines on the general format most letters should take. First Section: This first section should discuss how the author knows the Petitioner and his or her work. If the author does not personally know the Petitioner, then be sure to mention that in this section – letters from independent authors carry more weight with USCIS and you want to be sure to establish this at the beginning of the letter. Second Section: In this section, the author should discuss where he or she works, work experience, and other credentials. Basically, the author must convince the Adjudicating Officer that he or she is qualified to review the impact of Petitioner’s work on the National Interest. The author will want to list any positions or titles, as well as his or her educational background. Third Section: This section should be the longest and it is the most important. Here, the author will discuss what he or she knows of Petitioner’s work and explain the national significance of Petitioner’s work. - It is especially important that the author thoroughly discuss how Petitioner has already significantly impacted your field. - Key Words and Phrases Example: “Dr. Brilliant’s research has already significantly impacted our field through his discovery of…” - Also discuss why Petitioner’s research/work is groundbreaking and of such importance to the field. - Key Words and Phrases Example: “Dr. Smart’s seminal study into the causes of this disease was groundbreaking and pointed research into this disease into an entirely new direction by…” - The author can also discuss in detail how the Petitioner’s work has significantly advanced important goals in your field. - Key Words and Phrases Example: “For a long time our field has searched in vain for the pathogenesis of this disease. Dr. Intelligent’s study has finally done it….” - The author may also point out why the Petitioner is better than a similarly qualified U.S. worker. - Key Words and Phrases Example: “While there are literally thousands of post-doc researchers in this country, finding one with the skills and achievements of Dr. Sharp would be exceedingly difficult.” - Additionally, the author should discuss the “national impact” of the Applicant’s work. - Key Words and Phrases Example: “The treatment pioneered by Dr. Wise will have a direct national impact on those patients afflicted with cancer…” Fourth Section: In the conclusion section the author should write why he or she believes Petitioner’s continued presence in this country will benefit the your field and the national interest. I.E. “It would be in the best interest of the United States if Dr. Genius were allowed to stay in the country because…” Overall Length: There is no rule of thumb on the length of the letter. If you follow the above guidelines your letter will probably end up 1 ½ to three pages in length. Below is a detailed analysis by our office explaining some key factors to consider when procuring your letters of recommendation. 1. It is worth reiterating that letters from people you do not have a personal or professional relationship with will carry more weight with the USCIS than those from people who know you. That is not to say that letters from people that know, such as your colleagues or your boss are not important, these should definitely be included as well, but you should try to include at least 2-3 letters from independent experts (those who do not have a personal or professional relationship with you). 2. Usually, if the author of the letter is in a high position in the organization, the letter will carry more weight. For example, a letter from the “Director of Research at Laboratory X” will carry more weight than a letter from a “Research Associate at Laboratory X” 3. Letters from nationally recognized agencies such as The National Science Foundation, American Cancer Society, U.S. Department of Energy, etc. are extremely persuasive. 4. Letters from private research laboratories (that you are not employed at) or research institutions such as Amgen, or U.C. Berkeley are also very persuasive. Again, try to get letters from those higher up such as directors or lead researchers. 5. Also, make sure that the general language and tone for each of the letters differs from one another. USCIS may get suspicious if all of the letters are in the same voice or from the same template. Be sure to change some of the structure and language if your authors are all going off the same template. 6. And of course, don’t forget to thank the authors of your letters! The effect that your recommendation letters can have on your overall NIW petition cannot be understated. During the initial document intake process, our office works closely with the applicant to ensure that letters are procured from the best sources and agencies. Our office also reviews and revises all letters for our clients to maximize the persuasive impact of each one. This process is particularly important because we quote directly from the letters in the NIW petition letter itself – these citations make it particularly easy for the Adjudicating Officer to see the overall influence that the petitioner has had on the field. As always, jclawoffice.net is committed to providing our readers with the advice and analysis they need to stay informed of even the most difficult aspects of immigration law theory. This is the fourth installment of a ten part series discussing the essential elements of a successful NIW Petition. Keep checking back for additional installments and new treatises on various subjects affecting you and your immigration issues.
|
|||
2007-09-10 11:58
|
|
|||
|
| 回复选项: 限注册用户 积分10以上 HTML代码 |
Powered by CCB Version 5.206 © 2003-3 All Rights Reserved |
| 加州大学论坛 WWW.UCBBS.ORG (Universities in California Bulletin Board System) 版权所有 联系我们 Contact Us |